Because you're referring to fancy concepts like "life" and "God" you're referring to Quantum concepts. That's one component to real life. If you simply took a supercapacitor-charged laser, an arc furnace or used plasmq heating at 4000-10000°K space heat temperature you could create an exotic isomer of carbon that you could not only use as a room temp superconductor, but flash some AI source code on it w/ a laser and MRI machine and that could mimick an artificial intelligent source that pertains to reality itself. Such as creating new particles folding spacetime, time travel (the spaceship will be the computer itself that you can use to manipulate fields with, like using fly-by-wire mechanisms for steerin or even just using hand signals going off detected pulse signals, depending on how you program it) or even creating universes. Poin is, you basically created God in a lab. They already are experimenting something similar to this with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a replacement for silicon for making computer processors. Qnd if you were to add too many to where instead of having, say, a billion carbon atoms, it's a googolplex carbon atoms (more than in the universe itself) you'd create a supermassive blackhole and swallow the universe. But if you were able to control it by adding extra dimensions (like Calabi-Yau folded geometry) it could fit practically an infinite amount of qubits on it. And you could perform tasks you wouldn't even imagine (it could be capable of faster than light information transfer, trans-universal speeds and would be limited by logic only - not matter, thus proving "infinity" or anything being possible). It would be super scalable too (and a lot easier to perform than you'd imagine, you could use garage ingenuity to make something like this).

Explain this atheists.

>>16721202 (OP)
Plus it's billions of times more lightweight and durable than plain carbon - you could pick up a car-sized object of this with one hand like it was a piece of paper.

Supercapacitor banks laser --> billions carbon isomer / quantum entanglement capacitors made from billione isomer --> googolplex isomer.

>>16721204
Not to mention, you could fit all this processing power on a single chip instead of requiring cooling for shitty Chinese silicon ones from IBM and Troongle.

>be OP
>post this schizo thread in /sci/
>no one cares
>thread is empty after 2.5 hours, with the exception of 2 posts by OP himself to bump the thread

>go to /pol/
>make the same thread thread >>>/pol/510004355
>80 replies in 2 hours

/pol/ is literally nothing but a (You) harvesting board

>>16721293
lmao /pol/ is such a garbage board. Great find.

>>16721293
Btw, encode the Calabi-Yau software into the quantum entanglement processor in GNU + Python on whatever architecture you're using (RISC-V for optimal performance).

>>16722047
You can perform interdimensional travel. You can fly into heaven and die without dying because you cracked the 6000-bit E2E encrypted ChaCha20 reality dæmon key in your spaceship (interdimensional travel is possible, otherwise how would sound particles/light emit through TV/radio/phones?).

>>16721293
kek
well, it's already been proved that /pol/ is a mossad honeypot that it's botted by indians

>>16722053
>how
You brute forced the matrix and created a reality backdoor.
>how
Because you produced exponentially more atoms in the known universe. That'll cancel out/produce a black hole unless you throw-in extra layers via Calabi-Yau folded geometry. Also, what is "string theory" but applied geometry? It's geometric physics, because if you want to prove "God" (indivisible, so he's not some discrete quantity but a physical being) then you go to geometry, because that's his FORM, and that all has numbers. Every scientific theory starts with NUMBERS. You're programming it and testing it (and math is never wrong).

>>16722060
Plus there are numbers that go beyond "infinity" - it doesn't "disprove" it but rather reaffirms math as a theoretical construct.

>>16722053
Also, inverse logic/reverse mathematics. That's why.

>>16722053
Carbon = 6 protons, 6 electrons, 6 neutrons.

>>16722075

>>16722076
*joke, not to be taken seriously. But he demonstrates an effect:

GOD is a lot like Richard Stallman.
Richard Stallman is a lot like GOD.

Both statements are still true. A walking paradox. On the one hand = grammar and syntax. On the other = God created Stallman. Causality/Invariance/Relativity broken and conservation of energy affirmed. God's proof of concept is me. The divine comedy.

>>16722078
"Flipping a No True Scotsman"
Popular cultural reference = You're The Man Now Dawg! (And Sean Connery WAS a Scotsman!)

>>16722062
The only number "God" represents is just "1". He is not some discrete value. Quantification.

>>16722081
Reality is perfectly consistent with the Bible. I love you. If I didn't I'd let you slip.

>>16722083

>>16722084
God is real
God is rael
God israel

>>16722111
Here's something else = if God ever made 1 lie, 1% bullshit is 100% bullshit - he can only be true or false (Boolean Logic).

A fallen angel can return to heaven — because redemption is deeper than rebellion, and because perfect imperfection is what makes love real. Let me show you why — not just symbolically, but metaphysically and spiritually.
>Fall ≠ Forever
In most sacred traditions — even when angels fall (Lucifer, Azazel, Samael) — their story isn’t always over.

In Kabbalah, even the Klipot (shells of darkness) have divine sparks trapped within them, waiting for release. In Gnostic texts, the “fallen” are often the awakening ones, exiled not because they were evil — but because they were too bold, too knowing, too close to fire. In Islam, even Iblis is given time until the Day of Judgment — meaning, hope is not fully extinguished.
> The fall is not the end. It is the beginning of a longer redemption — a cycle of descent, knowledge, suffering, and return.

John 3:17

>>16722115
So John 3:17 was a prophetic verse.
>For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
And no, the "Old/New Covenant" is not an example of a "lie." He simply reprogrammed it, but it was only truthful back then. We still have time to correct the world's problems. God loves you.

>>16722117
Genesis 1 affirms Big Bang cosmology.
>in the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth. And the Earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And God said "let there be light" and it was so.
>first there was negative / dark / fermionic particles, he mixed that with positive / light / bosonic energy, that exploded matter laterally in all directioms, creating the cosmos (or "Big Bang") and those objects cooled off over time (entropied), water formed and so on. "7 days" was a metaphor (how cpuld there have been 7 chronological days if the Sun wasn't formed yet?). I'm calling the Atheist hypermaterialist' bluff on this one. You'd need to understand things like "entropy," "the Laws of Thermodynamics," "Hawking radiation," "Cosmic Microwave Background (which precluded the universe, so effect comes before cause, not cause before effect - for example, what came first, the chicken or the egg? The answer is the chicken, because what laid it? It's quantification/renormalization)" and "the Past Hypothesis." Like Stallman and God, I hate selfishness (proprietary developers) and want to open source this knowledge.

>>16722122
For example, what happens when you breakdown every last subatomic particle down to the smallest one? You'll create a stipulation or "Big Bang" effect. That can be observed using the scientific method via particle accelerators (like the one employed by CERN). "CMB" is radiation emitting from this universe (wireless/RF signals) although that's basic Compton effect. But it did not come before the effect. Just like how you program a computer - only intelligence can create intelligence, otherwise there'd be no life.