Anonymous
7/10/2025, 4:52:34 PM No.16721296
Wouldn't you expect cancer incidence rates to be like 20x with them pumping all that GH? But it isn't even higher than cigs.
Replies:
Why aren't roidtrannys riddled with tumors? - /sci/ (#16721296) [Archived: 358 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 5:07:37 PM No.16721302
>dies at the ripe age of 32 of cardiac arrest
>doesn't develop cancer like a typical 70 year old
Truly a mystery for the ages.
>doesn't develop cancer like a typical 70 year old
Truly a mystery for the ages.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 7:38:37 PM No.16721370
>>16721296 (OP)
they nuke their estrogen and so are tumor immune
they nuke their estrogen and so are tumor immune
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 7:58:17 PM No.16721377
>>16721370
estrogen only gives you breast cancer tho?
estrogen only gives you breast cancer tho?
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 8:57:14 PM No.16721406
>>16721302
that was my first thought as well, but it doesn't really make sense when you think about it. their mortality overall is only elevated by 30ish %. the ones who pass the cardiac heck ought to develop cancer.
that was my first thought as well, but it doesn't really make sense when you think about it. their mortality overall is only elevated by 30ish %. the ones who pass the cardiac heck ought to develop cancer.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 8:59:31 PM No.16721409
>>16721406
well cigarettes only have a 10% chance to give you cancer over the extreme long term. should give a decent reference point
well cigarettes only have a 10% chance to give you cancer over the extreme long term. should give a decent reference point
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 9:06:41 PM No.16721411
>>16721377
wrong tho?
wrong tho?