Watch me prove evolution in three bullet points.

1. Offspring resemble their parents (inheritance exists)
2. In nature, not all offspring live to reproduce (struggle for survival)
3. There are organisms alive today that did not exist in the past, and organisms existed in the past that do not exist today (fossils are real)

Retards think the theory of evolution claims something came from nothing blah blah you’re retarded. The theory of evolution argues that life changes over time (it evolves). You literally cannot disprove the three points above.

>>16721613 (OP)
You're preaching to the choir.
Take it to /pol/ if you wanna argue with drooling retards.

>>16721613 (OP)
It's like you walked into a church to tell people them Jesus undeniably exists.

>>16721613 (OP)
>Retards think the theory of evolution claims something came from nothing
They use 'theory of evolution' as a catch-all term that includes everything opposed to religious creationism; the claim here isn't about evolution specifically(that part comes when they start arguing about species differentiation and their artificial distinction of 'micro' and 'macro'evolution, 'kinds', etc.), but the origin of life itself, i.e. for something to exist to evolve in the first place
Thus the counterargument here would be to prove abiogenesis
>There are organisms alive today that did not exist in the past, and organisms existed in the past that do not exist today (fossils are real)
You use that point as an obvious axiom, but if you dig deep enough you'll find retards who disagree, hardcore creationism denies both splitting of entirely new species(only minor trait changes are allowed) and fossils(they were put there by god)

Keep hitting a random number generator of infinite range until it outputs your phone number
Feel stupid doing it? Like you are wasting time?
Well, that stupid waste of time is your theory of everything

>>16721622
this

>>16721613 (OP)
Why are that points prove anything?
The creator just build a habitable planet with all supplies and protection ad enact a few laws to make the whole thig run for itself. After he doing some fun building nice creatures impossible doing with his evolution principle. Butterflies par example.

>>16721613 (OP)
>There are organisms alive today that did not exist in the past

>1. Offspring resemble their parents (inheritance exists)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternation_of_generations

>>16721783
>wasting time
The universe doesn't have a goal it needs to optimize for time. Whether your number gets generated or not doesn't matter. It might happen soon, it might happen in gorillion years. Doesn't matter.

>>16721613 (OP)
I can disprove anything but God, but why bother?

>>16721613 (OP)
You cannot convince retards that evolution is real because they lack the braincells necessary to understand that evolution is not an agent.

>>16721989
this

>>16721989
okey but how does the monky know it supposed to turn into human? checkmate søyentists

>>16721613 (OP)
how do any of those prove anything? Those are observations that require explanation.
There is no answer afaik in evolution for irreducible complexity, ie development of organs that have no use until they are completely functional. The response is just "just wait 400k generations bro", in an environment that is supposedly selective and unforgiving. This is wishful thinking at best IMO.

>>16722011
>There is no answer afaik in evolution for irreducible complexity
The answer is "irreducible complexity" is a meme.

>>16722014
no wonder everyone thinks biology is a fucking joke.

>>16721613 (OP)
Evolution is incorrect. We are made in God's image, perfect and pure. All beings are God's creations, perfect and pure. There is no change. Change is an illusion woven by the Adversary. Maintain faith in God.

>irreducible complexity
>ie 'organs' ENTIRE FUCKIN ORGANS IS HIS EXAMPLE OF 'IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY'

>>16722039
yes, what's the matter? Are you saying evolution can't explain entire organs?

>>16721613 (OP)
Yeah.
Who are you arguing against? Boomers?
The conflation of abiogenesis with evolution only serves to confuse everyone.
Abiogenesis (or, Spontaneous Generation) is either unproven or disproven, depending on your point of view.
Evolution happens constantly.

>>16722035
Are you just trolling? Everyone knows that breeds change, for example. I don't think there's anyone that thinks animals can't change.