← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16722873

10 posts 14 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16722873 [Report] >>16722874 >>16722875 >>16722908 >>16722937 >>16723682
Heidegger: The Unheimlich
Whadup cnts, so, I've been posting this topic a lot here, trying to find out if someone's experienced this or are there any Scientific studies on this subject. Only received silly mocking replies.
Finally the answer(well, the direction at least) has been found.
Unheimlich is the fundamental groundlessness of our existence, this profoundly felt sense of not-being-at-home, wherever one would be. Just like the fear of death, we cover this fact by involving ourselves in always deeper illusions of familiarity: “while the particular Dasein drifts along towards an ever-increasing groundlessness as it floats, the uncanniness of this floating remains hidden from it under their protecting shelter” (Heidegger 1962, 214). Nonetheless, one may still feel the prevailing lack of true connection to a place. It is the experience of angst that allows us to truly reach the ‘existential’ depth of Dasein’s condition: not-being-at-home. Angst is a form of dread with an indefinite object of focus: it is the profoundly unpleasant and worried feeling about being alive, as such. This “being alive, as such” corresponds to Heidegger’s “Being-in-the-world”: “That which anxiety is anxious about is Being-inthe-world itself” (232). There is one possible way out, however, and this is what this anxiety leads to reveal: “In anxiety one feels ‘uncanny’” and Heidegger adds, “here “uncanniness” also means “not-being-at-home” (das Nichtzuhause-sein) (233). Angst, as threatening as it seems, is the human emotion, the human existential experience, that gives a chance to Dasein, the human being, to step away from its illusions of home and familiarity in order to reach a higher level of existence, of authenticity: “as Dasein falls, anxiety brings it back from its absorption in the ‘world’. Everyday familiarity collapses. Dasein has been individualized, but individualized as
Anonymous No.16722874 [Report] >>16722908
>>16722873 (OP)
Being-in-the-world. Being-in enters into the existential ‘mode’ of the “not-at-home”” (233). This process of individualization is cardinal: it is through the experience of angst that the human being is reminded, or rather, is confirmed of her individuality, that is, of the fact that it is ultimately a choice, a matter of freedom, to undertake to live the authentic life: “This individualization brings Dasein back from its falling, and makes manifest to it that authenticity and inauthenticity are possibilities of its Being” (235). Heidegger concludes: not-being-at-home is not just a passing feeling or even the impression of a few human beings; it is the fundamental state of all human beings: “From an existential-ontological point of view, the “not-at-home” must be conceived as the more primordial phenomenon”
Anonymous No.16722875 [Report] >>16722876
>>16722873 (OP)
Pre-story
Anonymous No.16722876 [Report] >>16722878
>>16722875
Anonymous No.16722878 [Report] >>16722879
>>16722876
Anonymous No.16722879 [Report]
>>16722878
Anonymous No.16722908 [Report]
>>16722873 (OP)
>>16722874
>Heidegger posting
shouldn’t you be busy crafting foreign policy or something, not shitting up the board with gay Continegral hocus pocus
Anonymous No.16722937 [Report]
>>16722873 (OP)
There's an ancient Chinese proverb that says:
>Man without pussy lives in a perpetual state of dualism but at the first taste of a drop he will know oneness with the entire ever flowing Tao.
Anonymous No.16723682 [Report]
>>16722873 (OP)
Anonymous No.16723684 [Report]
>>>/x/ is that way