If we are closer in size, scale and ratio to the atom and the quark on the Plank scale, then just what the hell is down there?
Another universe, with more mini atoms?
Max says it has a bottom.

>>16723815 (OP)
Why would there ever be a bottom of size in an infinite existence? What a dumb concept. Most of modern Physics is just brainlets shitting out the most ridiculous bullshit ideas imaginable. Defund all Physics.

>>16723815 (OP)
>Plank scale
The damage string theorists have done to public perception of physics will never be undone

>>16723815 (OP)
We will never know because it’s beyond the scope of what we can physically measure or see with our scientific instruments.


We will never know unless somehow we are able to see at smaller scales but as of 2025 we hit the limits

>>16723815 (OP)
>just what the hell is down there?
Nothing very interesting. Certainly nothing worth trillions of taxpayer dollars and grants to look at.

>>16723815 (OP)
These sort of scales are always incredibly dumb and you should take them with a healthy amount of skepticism.

My favorite is the age of the universe. If you make a timeline from the big bang until the heat death, we are so close to the beginning that it is almost impercetible from 0. If you use a gaussian distribution, it is statistically incredibly unlikely. Just this probability distribution tells you that your theory is fucking retarded and if you believe it you are a moron and should feel bad.

>>16723815 (OP)
What do you mean? Closer than what?

>>16724460
It doesn't matter how unlikely it is. For any given point in time, it is infinitely unlikely that the present coincides with it.

>>16723815 (OP)
I've heard that the average human is about halfway between the size of Planck Length, and the size of the observable universe