What will the average global IQ be in the year 2100, measured on a 2025 IQ test?

https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/world-population-day--trends-and-demographic-changes

>>16724768 (OP)
Hopefully 0 because everyone is dead.

>>16724768 (OP)
With AI? over 1000.

>>16724768 (OP)
>the people with no skills or resources are somehow breeding the most
Wha? I didn't realize Africa started producing enough food to sustain a growing population, that's awesome! Why isn't that in the news? Sure, the rest of us need to figure out how to survive better, but at least Africa is doing something right. Maybe we should ask them what they're doing so well that their birthrate are above ours.

>>16724792
>what they're doing so well
it's called fucking

>>16724795
It's called handouts from non-useless countries

>>16724768 (OP)
When populations really start dropping every region with fertility rate over 2 is going to get cut off first before anyone else. And they're arguably going to collapse faster, because they thrive on the charity of other countries (see >>16724797 )

>>16724768 (OP)
about 135 due to social pressures to do embryonic screening and trial-tested mental capacity improving gene editing.
population numbers are much lower due to runaway selection towards high-achiever societies that does not need or want 100iq jobs to exist.
The volcel revolution will be followed by the single child doctrine, born through an ideology of the newly-genius jobless hordes agreeing upon the cluttered state of resources not matching up to individual aspirations.
happy ending;
everyone is smart enough to cooperate towards a stable human biomass without degenerating into gang warfare.

>>16724804
Meanwhile in reality those noble "volcels" are simply voluntarily removing themselves from the human gene pool while brownoids breed like flies and plunge the world into a new dark age, and all those future "geniuses" are never born because everyone with the genetics to give birth to them would rather sit on their phone jerking off to anime all day than start a family.

>>16724768 (OP)

>>16724804
I too hope socialism and the taboo against eugenics is eradicated. It won't because we had that phase 130 years ago and it failed. Civilization is lost.

Fewer children per family means more resources can be devoted to each child, meaning better education, upbringing and possibly intelligence, or at least education. But then you have current technological progression which works in the opposite direction. Increasing technological dependency stifles intelligence and autonomy.

>>16724768 (OP)
No more iqfags on this fucking board clogging up the posts for fucks sake

>>16724768 (OP)
70

>>16724813
get raped and kys feminist

< tree fiddy

>>16724801
This will never not sound like cope
>>16724768 (OP)
Idk, depends on lots of factors. If co2 levels increase at the same rate, we'll probably have a max iq of 80 by then.
Unregulated factories pollute our brains even more. At least we didn't have gommunism

>>16724768 (OP)
we wont even get to 2100 jesus is coming back before that aka mua

lmao