https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTCcXC2mCcQ

>>16728990 (OP)
bump

i liek videos! sometimes i touch myself when i visit >>>/gif/

>>16728990 (OP)
I don't know what a "cohl" is and I'm not watching your faggot YouTube video to find out.
Summarize whatever point you're trying to make.

>>16730448
Ah, schizo shit? Nvm.

>>16730453
she is number #1 /sci/-fu

schizo share the same root as science

reddit and facebook is le that way

>>16730471
>schizo share the same root as science
No it doesn't.

>>16730475
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CF%83%CF%87%CE%AF%CE%B6%CF%89#Ancient_Greek

we are all scientists

>>16730476
Fair enough. I didn't realize the Latin "scientia" probably came from "skei-" but that still implies millenia of divergence between these words.

In any case, you're still a retard. Go back to >>>/x/

Look anon, many dimensions hypothesizing has been a thing sense maxwell, the biquaternionic formulation has brought revealing results to the areas in the standard model and its worth investigating

>>16730486
Not my fault it looks like the egyptians got there first abd the number partitioning problem was used to quantize the ultraviolet catastrophe which is aptly suited for the ising machine

Tick tock, against the young modulus of space time itself- the impedence of free space

>>16730488
christ, seek help

>>16730490
>it looks like the egyptians got there first abd the number partitioning problem was used to quantize the ultraviolet catastrophe which is aptly suited for the ising machine
No. It doesn't "look like" that at all unless you try to shoehorn this conclusion where it ostensibly doesn't fit.

>>16730488
Don't seek help, keep exploring. You need to go deeper friend

>>16730509
randomly boxing totally normal text from scientific publications in a huge collage in mspaint is, itself, not normal
i do research, and work with models with all sorts of dimensionality. knowing that, i suggest you seek professional help. there is something very aberrant with your thought process.

>>16730515
The moment you see someone arbitrarily overlaying a fibonacci spiral on something, you know you're dealing with someone who guzzles shitty youtube slop a lot more than doing genuine research.

>>16730525
>fibonacci spiral
lol, i missed that. my bullshit meter was already at 3.6 roentgens

>>16730509
will do anon, Kohl's work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BZyds_KFWM has been a valuble resource in extending the https://youtu.be/60z_hpEAtD8?t=2141 further into the caley dickenson construction

and brings me closer to a notion of the true algebraic structure of the heavens

it wasn't I who noted that the egyptians based their sacred measure on a dimension climber, i just realized, by the help of a mathematical coincidence, that it went all the way, and there is probably a different physics tradition lurking in solving the ultraviolet catasphrophe a different way without quantization

>>16730554
>Kohl,
Cohl mistype

scientifically speaking, which is the best pokemon?

>>16730525
You can't accuse him of being schizo as long as octonions exist and no one really understands them.

For all we know it really could be the final redpill. Why do non-associative, non-commutative numbers exist and why 8 dimensions.

>e_1 * e_2 * e_3 * e_4 * e_5* * e_6 = 7
>why
>coincidence? I don't know. It makes as much sense as everything else

>>16730722
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurwitz%27s_theorem_(composition_algebras)

>>16730515
https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2020/07/octonions_and_the_standard_mod.html
>
Of course, these days kids are discouraged from adding scalars and vectors, but if you use quaternions it’s okay. Here’s how you multiply quaternions...

Than you must see the importance in the distinction between em with the heaviside telegraph equations vs the clifford algebras and how this branches into modern physics

>>16730722
>Why do non-associative, non-commutative numbers exist
Indeed, the perplexity went three fold when learning doing universal logic with the NIMPY gate, a non commutative logic gate, was 3x more efficient than NAND.

Nature likes the path of least resistance