So basically, because you can't understand quantum mechanics, there is no god.

>>16729128 (OP)
Is that what you believe?
[spoiler]:^)[/spoiler]

>>16729130
Hey, at least I don't believe that the spoiler tag works on /sci/. ^_^

>>16729128 (OP)
>If classical computers cannot solve quantum mechanics
What do you even mean by "solving quantum mechanics"?

>God as an explanation of Quantum mechanics is from the classical mechanics of the mind, therefore it must be wrong.
Even if your premise were correct (whatever it even means), this is just denying the antecedent - a logical fallacy.

>>16729301
Richard Feynman argued that classical computers are fundamentally limited in their ability to simulate quantum systems due to the exponential growth of computational complexity with system size

>>16729301
He’s not denying the antecedent he literally affirms it.

>>16729467
Classical computers and Quantum computers can compute the same things. Quantum computers are just simply faster at solving certain classes of problems, such as integer factorization.

>>16729549
He (implicitly) argues that "If I have a quantum computer, then I will get a correct answer", which I guess is valid. He then goes on to argue "If I don't have a quantum computer, then I will not get a correct answer", which is fallacious. By "antecedent" I did not literally mean the previous statement in the image in OP.

>>16729620
Oh well reading verbatim isn’t that but good catch