why everytime we discover something this nigga's right?

>>16732124 (OP)
Black holes existing as they do show his theory wrong because it predicts an infinitely dense infinitesimally small point, however they clearly do not behave like that. They have measurable and mutable properties like charge, spin and mass, plus they can grow in radius and gravity by feeding or reduce through Hawking radiation.

>>16732124 (OP)
The universe is a Jewish creation. That's why the Jews are always right

>>16732128
you are a turbofaggot, let me tell you why
>durr einstein is wrong because theory no match data
>hawking radiation, a purely theoretical construct that has never been observed, totally explains what we observe!
retard

>>16732128
The event horizon of a black hole is not necessarily the same as the black hole itself.

>>16732124 (OP)
Don't you know he was God's chosen in Physics?

>>16732128
cool it with the anti einsteinium

>>16732171
Hawking radiation assumes relativity buddy. It's a consequence of Einstein's theory itself.
>>16732174
Yes, but how would an infinitely dense point generate a "bigger" or "smaller" Schwarzschild radius?

Typically is someone "contributes" an addendum you just say thanks.

Typically if someone "contributes" an addendum you just say thanks.

>>16732124 (OP)
Because a lot of His theories were stolen from actual work, i can't remember the name of His workplace (I'm an esl)

>>16732319
This. If it were infinitely dense and a true point (ring) there would be just one size of event horizon.
I can't say why, but my gut says LQG so I'm gonna guess planck stars.

>>16732124 (OP)
wa

>>16732124 (OP)
Because he actually thought about how his theory would work in reality and imagined the concepts pertaining to it instead of just scribbling down a bunch of math like a schizo and claiming he found the ark of the covenant of physics based on nothing, almost no one else does this today, even guys like Wolfram are just completely lost in abstract calculations and symbols.