>>16785534
nta but it is interesting because out of everyone here you were the first to begin with the posturing. you started off with an ad hom attack, and your rebuttal was nothing more than "trust the experts"
your first sentence was
>if you seriously think your question has merit to any degree, you are an anti government schizo.
if you were as smart as you feign, you wouldnt have responded to this thread to begin with. you'd simply hide it or sage in all fields, but no you spent your own time engaging with it, bumping it, and at the same time neither elaborated your opinion or stance, nor deconstructed or refuted the OP's line of thinking either. all you did was attack him, call him names, and talk about a generalized group of people who are "1000x smarter"
you are the biggest retard here and where others are willing to say they dont know for certain you will feign knowing better than any but being to smart to elaborate.. you are fraudulent.