← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16787238

13 posts 6 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16787238 [Report] >>16789680 >>16789802 >>16789806 >>16791149 >>16791174
Riemann Hypothesis solution
Hello 4chan i'm a poster since 2012 and I've recently attempted a solution on the Riemann Hypothesis and I ask if mathematicians here would briefly tell me how compelling my solution is.
Don't worry, I'm not about to go for the clay millennium prize, as I am certainly an imposter who doesn't really know math all that well.
https://ultimussaeculi.substack.com/p/a-proof-of-the-riemann-hypothesis
if however my solution turns out to be the first definitive proof I would like it attributed to a 4chan user and if 4chan users want to do the lean validation on it among other things I am open to collaboration.

We present an argument that all nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the line Re s = 1/2. The method builds a closed quadratic form in a theta‑weighted L2 space, identifies a controlled family of antisymmetric Mellin test functions by truncation, derives a global S‑identity connecting the form to the completed zeta function, and isolates a compensated boundary functional that carries the noncancellation hinge. Independent vertical‑strip bounds support the compensated boundary identity.
Anonymous No.16787250 [Report] >>16787359
i'm not reading that crackpot shit
Anonymous No.16787359 [Report]
>>16787250
A camel woooah :O
Anonymous No.16787976 [Report]
I wish this was real
Anonymous No.16789680 [Report]
>>16787238 (OP)
Publish it on ViXra.org or arXiv to get traction
Anonymous No.16789714 [Report] >>16789805
Why do schizos always try to solve the "big name" problems that everyone's heard of and which geniuses have spent decades trying to prove/disprove?
It would be more plausible if you claimed to prove some random open problem only a few hundred people are aware of, and it would probably only take a few hours of skimming papers on arxiv
Anonymous No.16789802 [Report] >>16791047
>>16787238 (OP)
Would it kill you to have better notation? Trying to read ^(1/4) and _w everywhere is slow and annoying. Can't be that hard to have proper TeX (or TeX-like) formatting.
Anonymous No.16789805 [Report]
>>16789714
I've always believed that the best way not to be written off as a crank and ignored on the big-name problems is to start out releasing something that nobody can ignore, like some kind of cryptological break that can be verified immediately.
Anonymous No.16789806 [Report] >>16791086
>>16787238 (OP)
>Hello 4chan i'm a poster since 2012
The only reason you're saying this is that you know someone posted the solution to a small problem on /sci/ in 2012 and you want people to think you're the same poster. :-/
Anonymous No.16791047 [Report]
>>16789802
tex and tex-like formatting is easy- just take the entire document, paste it to chatgpt, ask it for a conversion to latex.
the opposite is not tue- copying latex is not a straightforward task. so, i used a simplified text notation. thank you for giving a look over the tract.
Anonymous No.16791086 [Report]
>>16789806
>The only reason you're saying this is that you know someone posted the solution to a small problem on /sci/ in 2012 and you want people to think you're the same poster. :-/
this. original poster wasn't seeking recognition. this poster coyly trying to piggyback off the original poster gives himself a substack means of distinguishing his identity from us anonymous plebs. he's using us to get the hearing from academia that the original, nameless poster got.
Anonymous No.16791149 [Report]
>>16787238 (OP)
>lean validation
I'll need at least two, dawg.
Anonymous No.16791174 [Report]
>>16787238 (OP)

>Use Tesla's 3,6,9 multiplication web.

>Map out the prime spirals using geometric tempers.

>Sheave any excess growth patterns to fit spiral.

>let N = P

>let NP = Exponent