Thread 16825258

I am the universe/God manifesting reality.

>>16825258 (OP)
Speaking as a figment of your imagination, you've got a point

>>16825258 (OP)
Then simply eat yourself and level up to a self-contained Ouroboros god.

What about curing wet bulb and pzombies, and that equates to less solipsism

>>16825258 (OP)
You are meaningless. Individuals don't matter. He's talking about the sum of human psyche being a single consciousness interacting with itself.

Is one drop of the ocean meaningful without all the rest of the drops attached to it?

>>16825648
I am he

>>16825648
>Is one drop of the ocean meaningful without all the rest of the drops attached to it?
Its even more meaningful, its why they are looking so hard for single drops of water on planets and moons that don't have oceans.

Why do I sincerely believe in solipsism?

It's simple. Can I definitively prove that I am not hallucinating the universe and all its contents? No? Then I must be God.

>>16825677
>Can I definitively prove that I am not hallucinating the universe and all its contents?
Sure you can, the same way you can prove to yourself if you have quantum immortality or not.

>>16825711
I can prove that I am hallucinating it, but I can't prove that I'm not. Because I am.

>>16825258 (OP)
based,
congratulations, highest iq op on /sci/ rn
see you in the pleroma

>>16825258 (OP)
>I am the universe/God manifesting reality.

Why did you do this? That was really really stupid of you.

>>16826322
nta
but it's inevitable, the child loves to play, to play with their toys, play make believe
for play, the creator loves creation
and also it cant be stopped, it's just the perpetual cyclical flow of divine light from unity to separation and back again.
we've been here before
I've seen you before
where do I know you from?

So the only solution I have found to solipsism; which still actually implies solipsism, is an infinite recursion. We are all God and we are an infinite recursion and we go together as a set.

>>16825258 (OP)
Consciousness isn't real, retard.

>>16826471
and yet here I am.

>>16826478
No you aren't, retard.

>>16826487
I'm god lil bro

>>16826471
>but all this other shit my !not-consciousness sees? DEFINITELY REAL!
lol, materialists...

>>16825648
Give me a bunch of drops, and I will not be able to show you an ocean unless the drops disappear by mixing into an ocean.

>>16825258 (OP)
The only way to figure out solipsism is to make science understand life as fundamental instead of non-life as fundamental.

I have a 4d topography that resolves this dilemma. It's loaded, and so AMMA.

> How do you resolve solipsism vs materialism without retreating into cope-tier metaphysics?
My model treats both as communication failures rather than "positions." Solipsism isn't an argument, it’s a collapse of relational contact. Materialism isn’t a worldview, it’s a collapse of symbolic dimension. Both are dead ends unless you move to a field ontology.

In my model, reality is not made of mind or matter, but of contact between agents. The fundamental substance of reality is communication—what I call the 4D communicative field. All phenomena—self, object, meaning, world—emerge within this field.

This is why solipsism fails: a closed mind cannot stabilize itself. Without contact, thought loops eat themselves. That’s why solipsism maps to the schizophrenic dipole on my topology: infinite internal liquidity, hallucination of private reality, collapse of shared world.

Materialism collapses in the opposite direction. It over-anchors to objects and denies relational meaning. That maps to the autistic dipole: hyper-immanence, fixation, reduction of experience to brute mechanics. It isn’t wrong—just ontologically malnourished. It amputates the relational dimension.

Between them is the parabolic field of my model. The body (SOMA) anchors reality. The HALO (symbolic field) generates meaning. When two agents meet ethically, a world is co-generated. That is why communication—not isolated cognition—precedes ontology. Being is relational.

So how is solipsism resolved? Not with syllogisms—through re-entry into shared field via contact.
How is materialism corrected? By reabsorbing it as the somatic anchor that prevents symbolic drift, but giving it halo—meaning.

Solipsism is healed by otherness. Materialism is healed by meaning.
Both dissolve inside the communicative field.

> Field > Mind vs Matter.
Contact > Isolation.
Communication is the root of ontology.
Ask me anything.

>>16826640
Wait, it's all me experiencing myself?

>>16825258 (OP)
>I am the universe/God manifesting reality.
I used to think this way.
Then a simple realization changed the way I was thinking.

If by some miracle "I" happened to exist, then it follows that the same miracle will/has happened to someone else.

We are all Gods manifesting reality.
And the universe is the sum of our manifestations.

>>16826879
Nope.
It's an infinfurcating personal timeline lattice
Everyone has 100% free will over their reality, including over others, without contradiction.

>>16827027
There's no space for free will because there's nobody to have free will in the first place.

>>16826504
No you aren't, retard.
>>16826510
No it isn't, retard.

>>16827060
well technically I am nothing, which in a sense, is above god. so ur right

>>16827046
Yes, from the ascended perspective that is true- there is no one and no free will, just actions arising from the Void...
But "in the pit" there is the illusion of free will, wouldn't you say?

>>16825258 (OP)
No. You need to discect even the consciousness as a concrete "thing" as well. There are no singularity. There are no concreteness anywhere, what you instead are left with is compound phenomenas everywhere.

>>16827027
nope it's an arena of wills

what you are describing is death
yes it "exists" but it is an illusion

and after you die you will eventually be drawn back to the arena, cause it's cooler

>>16827205
It's arena but it's all you
EIYPO + multiverse
I rest my case

>Cooler
The arena i.e. separation is actually hotter, literally thermally.
The God waveform is very low frequency and temperature.
Why do you think quantum computers are COLD?
When the wave is higher frequency there is more duality and conflict.

>>16827205
>>16827209
The reason you go back is desire and cyclicality, not heat
Unless you're arguing cyclicality is driven by heat...

today a young adult male realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a moderate vibration. that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself from a particular perspective. there is no such thing as the concept of death, life is only a hallucination, and we are the imagination of our selves. here is Thomas with the weather report!

Wait, it's all ME experiencing MY self?

yeah solipsism is true

>>16825925
No, you just have to try to escape life, if life is dependent on you, you will not be able to escape and have proven solipsism, if it can go on without you, you will be able to escape and solipsism has been disproven.

Solipsism would imply you could not be surprised. No one is omniscient, thus solipsism is false.

>>16828761
I am no one.

>Solipsism would imply you could not be surprised
Name a less intelligent board.

>>16828907
I am OP.

I see two outcomes. Solipsism is true. I am alone

Solipsism is true. We are alone.

I don't know which one it is yet.

The Hindu concept of Maya is actually just objectively true. Everything is a hall of mirrors. You are God and everything is your reflection. This is obviously true if you just stop and think about it. Why am I here? How is anything here? It's all you.

>>16827209
>>16827211
Cooler as in more fun.
When you die you become an omnipotent God in your own reality, but it gets boring after a while and you return.
Paradoxically, the most fun thing in life is not being able to get what you want.
Everyone complains about it, but it is what keeps us going and entertained.

>>16826866
Duh

>>16825258 (OP)
>the world is an illusion
obviously
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MPHyR92MQic

>>16830378
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmZS0UKAIbI

>>16826478
>and yet here I am.
here you think you are*

Reality exists independent of the mind. Calling this the final scientific hurdle is like entertaining the "If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it" dumbfuckery. Yeah it's unfalsifiable, that's the point.

>>16830603
Reality doesn't exist independently of us at all. We are reality.

>>16830605
Us living in it, and it existing independently of us are two different things. If you died, reality will still live on. Ergo it exists independently of you, even if you live in it.

>>16830610
>inherently inaccessible, formless, abstract concept i made up exists independently from my mind because i conceive it to be so in my mind

>>16830616
You seem to have trouble understanding the terms "dependent" and "independent". Who let you on the science board?

>>16830618
>nonsequitur token string
Yep, that's a full and definite concession.

>>16827260
I got that reference. It's just a ride.

>>16830610
>If you died, reality will still live on.
How? How will it live on without me to perceive it? If it does live on, it must be through the perception of another, but where is that perception taking place? How did you end up in there and I ended up in here? Why am I not experiencing everything all at once, from all perspectives?

>>16830610
If I die, time ceases to exist, everything speeds up, and I observe all of this happening, because I am more than my body.

Are there any good books about the metaphysical and philosophical beliefs of the great physicists?

>>16830734
http://entityart.co.uk/electric-universe-free-energy-solar-system-hollow-earth-part-1/
also metaphysics is literally beyond physics... better to consult a sage

if you want true science:
>electric universe
>tesla
>walter russell
>free energy
>water powered machines
>energy harvesting buildings
>robert otey
>noel huntley phd fractals
>schauberger
>quantum physics
>critiques of gravity and relativity
etc.

otherwise:
>lurk /x/
>kybalion
>neville goddard
>daoism
>yoga
>etc.
based thread

>>16830610
There is no basis to assume the world existed before me, nor that it will exist after me. Not just that "my version" of it will end, that "the world" itself will.

I am god hallucinating the present moment

I'm not actually stupid.

Basically what we call God eclipses ordinary thinking. I am not alone at all.

nvm solipsism is true I was just tricking myself

>>16825258 (OP)
How could I be the only one who exists if the universe if full of things that I don't understand? Wouldn't my mind need to understand those things intricately to be able to create them and have them function correctly? Wouldn't at least one other person or god or whatever exist to have created the things I don't know how to create myself?

>>16825258 (OP)
How could I be the only one who exists if the universe is full of things that I don't understand? Wouldn't my mind need to understand those things intricately to be able to create them and have them function correctly? Wouldn't at least one other person or god or whatever exist to have created the things I don't know how to create myself?