← Home ← Back to /sci/

Thread 16831148

27 posts 6 images /sci/
Anonymous No.16831148 [Report] >>16831152 >>16831156 >>16831158 >>16831372 >>16831408 >>16832777 >>16832956 >>16833014
Scientifically speaking, what is the most scientifically painful torture method that can be inflicted on the human body? I'm talking so painful, the person's heart may just give out and they die anyways. Explain scientifically why this method would be the most painful if you will.
Anonymous No.16831150 [Report] >>16831376
Flaying the skin to expose the muscle and tendons underneath. Sprinkling salt into the exposed tissues. The amount of nerve endings that would be effectively set on fire could cause a person to go into shock and die.
Anonymous No.16831152 [Report]
>>16831148 (OP)
Finally a creative thread, can't wait to see what the /sci/entists cook up with this one.
Anonymous No.16831156 [Report] >>16831375
>>16831148 (OP)
I fucking tie you to a fucking bed post with your ass cheeks spread out and shit, right? Put a hanger on a fucking stove and let that shit sit there for like a half hour, take it off and stick it in your ass slow like tsssssssssssss
Anonymous No.16831158 [Report] >>16831161
>>16831148 (OP)
>the most scientifically painful torture method that can be inflicted
Putting sage in all fields.
Anonymous No.16831159 [Report] >>16831161
>LLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLILOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOOLOLLOOLOLLOOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOOLOLOLOLLOOLLOLOLOOLOLOLLOLOOLOLOLOLLOOLLOLOOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
>LE SCIENTIFICALLY LE SPEAKING LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE
Literally 100% of the time a thread's OP contains those 2 words, it's for the sole purpose of off topic shitposting
Therefore, OP must be reported as soon as possible and as much as possible for violating >>>/sci/rules/1
https://sys.4chan.org/sci/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=16831148
Anonymous No.16831161 [Report] >>16831162
>>16831159
>>16831158
You guys are no fun. This is technically a biology thread.
Anonymous No.16831162 [Report]
>>16831161
Mental Wounds Never Heal.
Anonymous No.16831372 [Report]
>>16831148 (OP)
The Pain Amplifiers of Ix are best
Anonymous No.16831375 [Report]
>>16831156
BASED wu-tang anon
Anonymous No.16831376 [Report] >>16831383
>>16831150
this but force feed them meth first so they cant pass out from the pain
Anonymous No.16831381 [Report]
First, you must understand what pain is. Pain is a sensation felt through the receptors of the nerve endings. Nerve endings exist in most layers of the human body from the skin to even bone. Even exposing a naked nerve ending to breeze can cause unfathomable pain sensations. So the greatest torture would be to peel back parts of the body layer by layer in a prolonged multi day/week long process.
Anonymous No.16831383 [Report]
>>16831376
That actually works against the goal because meth will decrease the sensation of pain.
Anonymous No.16831408 [Report]
>>16831148 (OP)
you can inflict whatever in a body. if God protects it, the being will not feel pain and/or will not suffer from it
Anonymous No.16832717 [Report]
Bump, aren't there any creative sadist anatomy experts here?
Anonymous No.16832728 [Report] >>16832742
Implant an electrode into the somatosensory cortex and hippocampus of the brain.
By stimulating the correct nerves, one can illicit a pain response in the somatosensory cortex without it being associated with any particular location data. Just pure, etherial pain without any perceived source.
Meanwhile, the hippocampus can be stimulated to illicit a primal fight or flight response indepentent of any sensory data.

The victim of this treatment would be senselessly terrified while undergoing a kind of pain no human being has ever experienced before.
Anonymous No.16832742 [Report]
>>16832728
Quite devious my good sir.
Anonymous No.16832777 [Report] >>16832838 >>16833018
>>16831148 (OP)
having to put up with your shit on a daily basis.
Anonymous No.16832838 [Report]
>>16832777
numbers don't lie
Anonymous No.16832848 [Report] >>16832851
burning
Anonymous No.16832851 [Report]
>>16832848
How would the body differentiate burning from flaying and salting the exposed flesh?
Anonymous No.16832856 [Report] >>16832859
Sorry, I don't reply to threads posted by Dark Eldar
Anonymous No.16832859 [Report]
>>16832856
Yet you are replying to this one, mon-keigh... curious
Anonymous No.16832956 [Report]
>>16831148 (OP)
Whatever shit the CIA found by torturing people for seven decades.
Anonymous No.16833014 [Report]
>>16831148 (OP)
making someone watch the prequels
Anonymous No.16833018 [Report]
>>16832777
Got 'em.
Anonymous No.16833027 [Report]
>A fundamental question is what should we adopt as the default assumption. Brian advocates the traditional choice that we are alone until proven otherwise. This obviously gives us a sense of self-importance and removes the urgency to invest funds in the search for evidence.

>But physicists like Brian do not insist that dark matter does not exist until discovered. Since we had not detected dark matter particles so far, the most conservative view should have been to assume that known matter and radiation are the only cosmic constituents. Instead, physicists invested billions of dollars in searching for specific types of dark matter particles. This was motivated by indirect evidence for the existence of dark matter, based on its gravitational influence on the dynamics of visible matter and radiation. Nevertheless, if gravity happens to be modified at low accelerations, this indirect evidence is incorrectly interpreted.

LMAO I literally made this point independently here last week, and he is absolutely both based and correct here.

Either be conservative and be skeptical of unfalsifiable things like dark matter/energy until directly observed, or be loose and embrace the possibility of things like, if not le ayyys, biosignatures on exoplanets.

But going around telling the public the universe is 96% invisible woo bullshit so your model doesn't brake while howling like a gibbon about "muh extraordinary evidence" when someone suggests a biosignature molecule is a sign of life on an exoplanet is the sort of hysterical hypocrisy that has lead to an ever steepening cliff fall in credibility for the scientific community.