Why no other wrestler gets this level of negative flack for even existing?

People:
>accuse him of cheating on his wife because he takes pictures with other female wrestlers
>fantasize about raping him
>share and keep a stash of pictures of him beaten up for having tried going to a different business, which is very brave
>despise him when he is professional and leaves personal business aside
>despise him when he is unprofessional does not leave personal business aside
>celebrate when he appears or wins
>celebrate when he does not appear or loses
>accuse him of being pedophile for taking pictures with a young fan like every wrestler does
>promos about him often become personal, where he goes from an opponent to some loved one who abandoned them

My psychoanalytical view of Punk derangement is like a father replacement, very much in the freudian sense. Men with daddy issues despise Punk the same way women with daddy issues love him.

Why do people think Punk (and Phil, we can hardly tell one apart) was supposed to be Chicago's Hustle-Loyalty-Respect?

>indie legend who came to Ring of Honor from a place of humility, character evolved to portray himself as becoming larger than the place
>signed his WWE contract on the Ring of Honor, ultimate heel move, and threatened to leave RoH with the championship
>came in as babyface to WWE due to popularity, but nobody knew what to do with him even when he had the title
>first real character was the Straight Edge Messiah, also a hypocrit, very close to his late star heel character on RoH
>second character was the voice of the voiceless, except he left the company the day he won the title
>turned heel when it ceased to be convenient, getting in his grunts to make things easier for him to defend his title
>AeW character was a disaster babyface, where his attitudes in real life kept mixing up with his wrestling storylines, the main accusation against Phil being of hypocrisy

He was always a hypocrit, but he is the hypocrit that gets his way.