Search Results
ID: Xa9vhrkv/biz/60521558#60524669
6/20/2025, 1:52:48 AM
>>60524598
>if Sergey actually had ambitions to make selling link his claim to fame he'd have worked with market makers and used what capital he had to pump the token himself, attracting hordes of retail to dump on, similar to other projects like XRP/ADA).
I'll have to admit if the purpose of LINK was to simply dump on retail there was no need for the scheme to run this long, behave the way it did and more importantly hire 700+ people or however many into the team but only if you look at Sergey and co. as small time scammers. If you wanted the grift to be world-class, you'd target both retail and institutions alike, playing a far longer and sinister game. Not saying I believe that's what they are doing, ironically enough I still can't decide if the project was one massive (but elaborate) scam or simply a good actor that's destined to fail because everyone else is stupid or evil, I'm just tired iregardless of what the truth is.
>the fact that people on this basket weaving forum are so insanely desperate to convince you that link is the biggest retail based scam of them all is a tell
Like I already said, it could be reverse psychology because frankly if the fudders are legitimate and really want everyone out of LINK then their effect is the exact opposite, just like Zeus (seriously can you think of a single 2017-2018 oldfag fall for that? it's why I think it was a brilliant) this is where my schizo senses start thinking that maybe even the fudders are on the payroll. It is a very backwards way of looking at things but everybody lies.
>but logically what you're proposing doesn't make sense.
If I had to guess, the entire purpose of crypto was to a) another tool to keep inflation at bay by removing fiat out of circulation and b) crash it all to 0 (by crypto standards at least) in some "black swan" Saylor scheme or something like whoops suddenly something is wrong with BTCs security, wouldn't it suck if everyone was balls deep in it now because it performed so good?
>if Sergey actually had ambitions to make selling link his claim to fame he'd have worked with market makers and used what capital he had to pump the token himself, attracting hordes of retail to dump on, similar to other projects like XRP/ADA).
I'll have to admit if the purpose of LINK was to simply dump on retail there was no need for the scheme to run this long, behave the way it did and more importantly hire 700+ people or however many into the team but only if you look at Sergey and co. as small time scammers. If you wanted the grift to be world-class, you'd target both retail and institutions alike, playing a far longer and sinister game. Not saying I believe that's what they are doing, ironically enough I still can't decide if the project was one massive (but elaborate) scam or simply a good actor that's destined to fail because everyone else is stupid or evil, I'm just tired iregardless of what the truth is.
>the fact that people on this basket weaving forum are so insanely desperate to convince you that link is the biggest retail based scam of them all is a tell
Like I already said, it could be reverse psychology because frankly if the fudders are legitimate and really want everyone out of LINK then their effect is the exact opposite, just like Zeus (seriously can you think of a single 2017-2018 oldfag fall for that? it's why I think it was a brilliant) this is where my schizo senses start thinking that maybe even the fudders are on the payroll. It is a very backwards way of looking at things but everybody lies.
>but logically what you're proposing doesn't make sense.
If I had to guess, the entire purpose of crypto was to a) another tool to keep inflation at bay by removing fiat out of circulation and b) crash it all to 0 (by crypto standards at least) in some "black swan" Saylor scheme or something like whoops suddenly something is wrong with BTCs security, wouldn't it suck if everyone was balls deep in it now because it performed so good?
Page 1