Search Results
7/17/2025, 2:21:18 AM
>>7649516
It's normal
It's normal
6/5/2025, 4:27:35 PM
>>7597154
Based. I would only add to the image that people like mathematicians who claim it are basically using alternate pathways because they're just more developed from their profession, so it requires less mental effort comparatively.
>>7597166
>its a concept thats been mentioned as early as the 1800s by Francis Galton
Not an argument https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model
>even one who is a bus driver who could not draw a bus from memory, or could very rudamentarily construct one as if it was drawn by a 2 year old
That isn't related much at all. See picrel. Use of something like a bus on the daily does not mean storing and retaining the visual information of its form. In his case, this would especially be since he is inside the bus most of the time, and the extreme familiarity with the same route would reduce the effort expended on storage to observation of symbols and heightened awareness of unfamiliarity.
>>7597183
>cool source brah. definitely gives your opinion more credibility than the millions of imam over the years who say allah is supreme
Argumentum ad populum + Argument from authority, moreso that is an argument in favor of institutional failure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
As stated: The premise that aphantasia exists is assumed to be true a priori, it is not questioned. The definition also continually shifts.
Simple refutation of the pupil test: The pupil dillation test isn't valid as plenty of people have 0 reason to imagine anything brighter or darker than would be necessary. It's extraneous information to remember and recall unpleasant experiences vs just recalling everything in neutral lighting.
Presuming an unfalsifiable concept exists a priori is not science, it's religion.
>>7597225
The core is that IF they were working so differently as to be truly aphantasic, THEN they would be intellectual cripples.
Based. I would only add to the image that people like mathematicians who claim it are basically using alternate pathways because they're just more developed from their profession, so it requires less mental effort comparatively.
>>7597166
>its a concept thats been mentioned as early as the 1800s by Francis Galton
Not an argument https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model
>even one who is a bus driver who could not draw a bus from memory, or could very rudamentarily construct one as if it was drawn by a 2 year old
That isn't related much at all. See picrel. Use of something like a bus on the daily does not mean storing and retaining the visual information of its form. In his case, this would especially be since he is inside the bus most of the time, and the extreme familiarity with the same route would reduce the effort expended on storage to observation of symbols and heightened awareness of unfamiliarity.
>>7597183
>cool source brah. definitely gives your opinion more credibility than the millions of imam over the years who say allah is supreme
Argumentum ad populum + Argument from authority, moreso that is an argument in favor of institutional failure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
As stated: The premise that aphantasia exists is assumed to be true a priori, it is not questioned. The definition also continually shifts.
Simple refutation of the pupil test: The pupil dillation test isn't valid as plenty of people have 0 reason to imagine anything brighter or darker than would be necessary. It's extraneous information to remember and recall unpleasant experiences vs just recalling everything in neutral lighting.
Presuming an unfalsifiable concept exists a priori is not science, it's religion.
>>7597225
The core is that IF they were working so differently as to be truly aphantasic, THEN they would be intellectual cripples.
Page 1