Search Results
7/4/2025, 7:25:11 AM
>>509464237
I’ll make it easy for you. I’ll be the climate “scientist.”
The first thing I do is “adjust” the historical temperature record to make it look more stable than it really is. I iron down the temps in the Roman Warm Period and Medieval Warm Period to hide how the temps were comparable to or warmer than current temps.
Next, I graft the satellite temperature data onto the historical measured data which used ground based thermometers - without making the adjustments necessary to make sure they’re showing the same thing. Why? Because the satellite data reads higher. That makes it look like there is a sudden increase starting in the 70s.
Then I keep adjusting the satellite data to fix “mistakes.” Of course 95% of those adjustments only go up, not down.
Then I graft projections from my global climate model program onto the end of the satellite data to show the Super Scary increase in temperature that’s going to happen if the heathens don’t mend their ways.
I do not tell anyone that my model can’t hindcast. I do not tell anyone what the error levels in the model are. I do not tell anyone that the curve is actually the sum of dozens of model runs and that makes the error levels even worse. I do not tell anyone that none of the things that my models predict like a hot spot in the troposphere have EVER occurred. I certainly don’t tell anyone that I don’t know what the true values of half the variables in my model are - to the point where I don’t even know if a lot of them are supposed to be positive or negative.
Nor do I tell anyone that the entire concept of a climate tipping point is something I pulled straight out of my ass and I have absolutely no mathematical theory that predicts it. But it’s necessary for my doomsday scenario so it’s there.
I also don’t tell anyone that the greenhouse effect from CO2 is logarithmic, not exponential or even linear, so my theory cannot physically even work.
I’ll make it easy for you. I’ll be the climate “scientist.”
The first thing I do is “adjust” the historical temperature record to make it look more stable than it really is. I iron down the temps in the Roman Warm Period and Medieval Warm Period to hide how the temps were comparable to or warmer than current temps.
Next, I graft the satellite temperature data onto the historical measured data which used ground based thermometers - without making the adjustments necessary to make sure they’re showing the same thing. Why? Because the satellite data reads higher. That makes it look like there is a sudden increase starting in the 70s.
Then I keep adjusting the satellite data to fix “mistakes.” Of course 95% of those adjustments only go up, not down.
Then I graft projections from my global climate model program onto the end of the satellite data to show the Super Scary increase in temperature that’s going to happen if the heathens don’t mend their ways.
I do not tell anyone that my model can’t hindcast. I do not tell anyone what the error levels in the model are. I do not tell anyone that the curve is actually the sum of dozens of model runs and that makes the error levels even worse. I do not tell anyone that none of the things that my models predict like a hot spot in the troposphere have EVER occurred. I certainly don’t tell anyone that I don’t know what the true values of half the variables in my model are - to the point where I don’t even know if a lot of them are supposed to be positive or negative.
Nor do I tell anyone that the entire concept of a climate tipping point is something I pulled straight out of my ass and I have absolutely no mathematical theory that predicts it. But it’s necessary for my doomsday scenario so it’s there.
I also don’t tell anyone that the greenhouse effect from CO2 is logarithmic, not exponential or even linear, so my theory cannot physically even work.
7/3/2025, 3:33:22 PM
Astrology is more of a science than climate “science.”
6/21/2025, 10:25:34 PM
6/21/2025, 3:42:29 AM
Fuck off back to plebbit, nigger
6/17/2025, 10:28:51 PM
>>507769028
Trust the “science”
Trust the “science”
Page 1