>women are not attracted to 90% percent of men (rightfully so - they're evolutionary gatekeeper of reproduction)
>modern civilization depends on most men being involved in society
>modern era of liberty gave women the right to freely chose their partners
>freely available information made the above clear to men turning them into neets - as they have no chance of finding a partner (at least the one finding them desirable) anyway
What's the solution to the above conundrum?

I'm sick of seeing guys my age obsessed with this idea that a woman has to be completely "pure" to be worth marrying. Like if she’s had a relationship before, suddenly she’s trash. They act like this is some return to tradition, but it's not it’s just bitterness dressed up as moral superiority. It’s demoralising. It's killing our chances of forming real families.

You can’t build a civilisation without families, period. But this weird purity cult is pushing guys away from even trying. Instead of encouraging men to be strong, protective, and build something, it turns them into paranoid loners who see women as enemies. It's not noble. It's self sabotage.

Let’s be real most people have a past. So what? Life happens. What actually matters is whether someone wants to build something lasting with you. A woman who’s loyal and ready to create a stable home is worth more than a fantasy about some imaginary virgin wife who doesn’t exist.

We’ve got to stop chasing this nonsense perfection. It's not helping. It’s isolating us, delaying families, and handing our future over to people who *are* willing to commit and build. Women aren't the enemy they’re the other half of what keeps a culture alive.

The future doesn’t go to the ones who stay "pure" while doing nothing. It belongs to the ones who build. Always has, always will.

śmierć nato