>>508974566
>>508974934
Why would they remove it? That video was taken in public. Literally everyone who was anywhere close to that kid that day (at least dozens of people) got to see exactly that but in even more detail. If those clothes are "appropriate" for wearing in some department store, how could they also be grounds for removal from /pol/?

Time to stare into the abyss here dudes, this guy
>>508974734
is completely correct. On the rare occasions I'm anywhere near a gaggle of middle schoolers or young high schoolers, somewhere between 99% and 100% of the girls are wearing exactly that. The only exceptions are the older girls who have moved on to leggings (no skirt). I really can't get over that bit. Leggings are literally just tights worn without the skirt that would traditionally go over it. It's not a new garment, it's just an old skirt outfit minus the skirt.

These girls are getting hypersexualized. They wear stuff that not too long ago would've been considered suitable for Playboy only. They get on the internet and watch porn. They take nudes of themselves and send it to random boys who ask for it. Sometimes they make porn starring themselves and put it on Pornhub (or used to before they finally got busted for it), they've mostly moved on to Onlyfans. And when they're not doing that they're updooting and idolizing even sluttier influencers who are.

It is crazy what is going on, women aren't stopping it, mothers are living vicariously through it, and the only people who care (men) are too scared to say shit. It's out of control and nobody's stopping it.