>>49745270
Another one? Well, I won't complain. Let's see if the catalog of /jp/ ends up like /bant/ catalog with the Cirno threads

>>49736727
Wow!

>>22874164
I'll use your logic: So, here's the deal; if two or more lole individuals manage to be together, then they would still be lole? to be lole one must be lole, if you are not lole at all, then you can't be lole