>>81624854
>anti laws that advocate for women, think rape is fake
These things sound bad in and of themselves but can reffer rather broadly to many things. Considering voting for example, women, obviously shouldn't vote. This isn't a question of liking or not supporting women (though arguably them not voting would work in their own interest in the long term, feminism is a psyop), this isn't a question of hatred or viewing them as lesser beings, it's a question of the differences between men and women, evolution, and finally, the menifestations of allowing them to vote, it's been shown that if only women voted they'd all vote left wing, for radical left wing causes. It's not a question of them "being able to think for themselves". Women do not think the same as men. That doesn't mean they are incapable of logic, that doens't mean they are incapable of being intelligent, but fundamentally they're brains aren't the same, they ways they function aren't the same, and when you account for propaganda, something which is abundant in society and has been for a very long time (propagand didn't end in WW2 by the way, many have a retarded conception of what propaganda is, hollywood is propaganda), they are especially susceptible to it. Propaganda often is intended to jump over the process of rational thought, skip the very possibility of it, and especially get to people at an emotional level. Women are, obviously (should go without saying) a lot more emotional than men, they think emotionally. Even when they have a point, even when they are correct about a thing (and certainly there are many things they are correct about in retarded internet discourse because internet discourse is retarded) they often appeal to emotion. It's their modus operandi. One could perhaps argue that if the problem of disfunctional family units, and the exportation of thought to "others" like goverment and media were solved, it would cease to be an issue, but whatever the case may be -cont'd