>>17775183
>I feel like if the man who did something as unthinkable as conquering the known world fucked boys we would know about it
We do know about it.

>None of the excerpts state it
They do state it.

>which you concede by suggesting that it must be implied
I didn't concede anything, I knew you were going to deny the implications of the texts (which you did) because you have displayed throughout the thread that you are dishonest and make tendentious interpretations of texts which contradict your worldview.

>maybe 5% of the overall population has the thought of raping a child
Adult-child sex is not synonymous with rape; by using value-laden language, you only work to obscure your own argument and confuse readers.

Also, phallometric studies using community samples tell us that roughly one in four men show as much arousal to images of children as they do to adults. Phallometry in individual cases is already reasonably reliable, which you can verify yourself by looking at sexual stimuli which you find sexually arousing; aggregated phallometric studies are even more reliable when it comes to making judgements on a group level, and these studies prove that sexual attraction to children is common. Your contention that attraction to children is uncommon is untrue.

The majority of pederastic relationships in Greece occurred between men and adolescent boys; the boys Alexander had sexual relations with were likely teenagers, so we aren't even talking about children. Nice strawman.

Another bad argument debunked.

>>17775196
>>17775206
It's an on-topic thread which doesn't violate any rules. Keep crying about it.