>>5076854
>>5076979
Yeah it was one dedicated guy who kept it running for quite some time. The shutdown made him realise that even though he had a nice system it was still a bit of time and effort to do it. He came and said he was going to stop.

There was probably 4 or 5 or 6 pretty regular enjoyers of the thread judging by the poll numbers, but of them only half regularly even posted comments. Just quiet enjoyers.

I really appreciated the thread, it was dead slow, and kept me up to date with new music videos and groups and some shows. I'm a bit lost without it.