Search Results
6/12/2025, 10:49:37 PM
>>507131317
It’s impossible to measure in practice (i.e. technically physically possible but too resource intensive to carry out with current technology), especially without killing the person or performing incredibly invasive and delicate surgery.
For a more precise answer, the exact characterization of ANY complex behavior in terms of arrangements of individual neurons is simply not known. If you figure it out you’ll qualify for a Nobel Prize. It is an open question that we will probably not have an answer to for decades.
As a consequence, we have to resort to more ambiguous measurements of emergent phenomena. Does that make sense?
It’s impossible to measure in practice (i.e. technically physically possible but too resource intensive to carry out with current technology), especially without killing the person or performing incredibly invasive and delicate surgery.
For a more precise answer, the exact characterization of ANY complex behavior in terms of arrangements of individual neurons is simply not known. If you figure it out you’ll qualify for a Nobel Prize. It is an open question that we will probably not have an answer to for decades.
As a consequence, we have to resort to more ambiguous measurements of emergent phenomena. Does that make sense?
Page 1