>>17857541
>Casualities are usually lopsided in war because they happen after an enemy is routed.
>usually
Absolutely pathetic degrees of cope.
>Churchill forced his men into dangerous sorties to gain an advantage
>to gain an advantage
>an advantage
And then won because of it. What are you even trying to argue at this point? Screeching "le zerg rush" is not an argument you faggot.
>an insane amount of casualities for the winning side
And you've determined that it's an "insane amount" based on what, exactly? Your own arbitrary decision? Or could it be because you have no fucking clue what you're talking about, as you proved immediately when you said he was "recalled" for "le zerg rushing", a lie that anyone with just the most basic knowledge of the man would know is blatantly false.
>be picrel
>call Churchill back into service because he was le heckin epic zerg rusher
Oh wait, that never fucking happened