>>507184012
Most genocidal are obviously the bantu niggers, who during the bantu expansion genocided 100s of african races to total extinction.
When Europeans went to everywhere in the world, they brought civilization with them. Built schools, hospitals, roads, railways, infrastructure. Brought writing, reading, language.
Meanwhile the non-whites have often genocided whatever they could when they roamed around, for example the arabs who are originally jeet gypsies who were called canaanites, just like their jew brothers, they rampaged through the whole of MENA and killed off / raped the original population.
Good example of this is ancient Egypt, the modern Egyptian is nothing alike the original civilization, they're all gone now.

Compare that to modern day USA for example, not only were the indians that could have easily been just exterminated, given their own lands to live in, and later even invited to White society with not only the same rights as Whites, but even their own special rights.
I don't know of any other example where the conquerors give the conquered peoples MORE rights than themselves. The generosity of the White man truly knows no bounds, even to extent when slimy jews and arabs exploit it, it becomes a liability to the very existence of the White man which we have now seen being duped into allowing foreign tribes to exploit our generosity.

That jewish talking point of "whyte man bad genocide" is so commonly heard from non-whites, so who did the White man genocide?