>>24504067

You are committed to believing William Shakespeare obsessively plagiarised thousands of phrases and ideas (including somehow plagiarising private manuscripts of North)?
What is more believable is that North was the original author, we don't need to posit William Shakespeare as the greatest plagiarist in history.

>I find it hard to believe that this guy went through his own material to make the plays and then he put someone else's name on them.

North sold the plays, just as Groatsworth of Wit and Ben Jonson discuss. North was disinherited and broke.
Do you believe Shakespeare also wrote the Apocrypha as his name is on them?