>>509064940
lol
Only retarded americans can't differentiate between myth vs history, between poetic and symbolic vs literal.
The very fact that Thor initially argues against it to protect his male virtue indicates a society where crossdressing would be seen as unacceptable. Only due to the dire circumstance (heaven being at risk of defeat by hell, to use language you might be more familiar with) does he accept the dishonor.
This is exactly what we find in Scandinavian divorce laws: a crossdressing spouse would be legal grounds for divorce.
Nice try.