>>40842510
>In the sense you declared them to be literally, objectively true and "good"
That's really not what "literally" would mean here.

Like, for a figure of speech to correlate to something real wouldn't stop it from being a figure of speech.
A "literal" view of the Tree of Life would be one in which the Sephira are literal angels.

I'm talking about a subtle "systemic tendency" in the behavior of reality itself.