Search Results

Found 1 results for "069128db0f9af34291a5b1735a3cc8bf" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous ID: YjShpmh9United States /pol/509081477#509087428
6/30/2025, 3:33:25 AM
>>509086754
Oh, shit. Talk about something the chief executive should have is the ability to line item veto shit. Guess what, if you don't want to get line itemed then maybe fuckin' do ONE BILL PER ISSUE.

Anyway, damn, man I thought we lived in a realm of rationality. "Presidents of the United States have repeatedly asked Congress to give them line-item veto power.[14] According to Louis Fisher in The Politics of Shared Power, Ronald Reagan said to Congress in his 1984 State of the Union address, "Tonight I ask you to give me what forty-three governors have: Give me a line-item veto this year. Give me the authority to veto waste, and I'll take the responsibility, I'll make the cut, I'll take the heat." Bill Clinton echoed the request in his State of the Union address in 1995.[15] Congress granted this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 to control "pork barrel spending", but in 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the act to be unconstitutional in a 6–3 decision in Clinton v. City of New York. The court found that exercise of the line-item veto is tantamount to a unilateral amendment or repeal by the executive of only parts of statutes authorizing federal spending, and therefore violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution. Thus a federal line-item veto, at least in this particular formulation, would only be possible through a constitutional amendment."