>>105882600

non-vendored, yes. non-mozilla is not accurate. some are (directly) maintained by mozilla. some are not.

also, one shouldn't take their info from jeet-logiced nocoders who continue to move their own goal posts. especially when it's such a shallow "analysis".

slightly less shallow "analysis" is in picrel, where you see the ratio of Rust vs. C/C++ before and after running `cargo vendor`. but this is of course still shallow, since it doesn't even cover conditional compilation (DEFINEs in C/C++, cfg in Rust) for starters, or tests et al. not to mention the fact that any LoC-based "analysis" is retarded to begin with.

but one can at least deduce that that no, the rust code you see getting compiled is not just for some "devtools" and the crash reported. and if you would take /g/eet claims at face value, you would think that amount of rust code would take a week to compile, but it doesn't.

running `cargo vendor` would also give you an idea about other areas (other than stylo and wr) where Rust is used in Firefox.

>noooo reddit spacing