Search Results
6/20/2025, 11:49:52 PM
6/8/2025, 2:15:25 AM
>>17745662
Just like in the other thread, he will deny that consensual adult-child sex exists, or if it does exist, it is too infrequent to matter. He spams irrelevant, poorly conducted studies with methodological flaws (they are all studies on self identified rape victims recruited from criminal/psychiatric samples) and refuses to admit that there are any issues with this approach:
>>17726366
He claims adult-child sex is inherently non-consensual, in spite of these anthropological examples where we can clearly read that these relationships are consensual, and that there is nothing inherent to adult-child sex which makes children indisposed to these relationships, unlike the victimologist feminist claim, and in spite of surveys in modern Western countries that show that the majority of adult-child sex is considered consensual by the child participant.
>>17745674
And just like in the other thread, you define your personal positions as axiomatic, not providing any argument to support them. You make an arbitrary distinction between the hedonic appreciation of sex and other human endeavours, without reason, and refuse to address any criticism of this position. You continue to argue a position which you know has been refuted, your claim is that it is not virtuous to engage in sexual activity for non-reproductive purposes, not that it is prudent to avoid sexual activity when there are better alternatives to bring about benefit.
When someone brings up a refutation of your point, you hand-wave it away by implying the matter of the refutation is too difficult to understand.
Give up. You can't even properly argue this strongly held position of yours.
>>17745687
All benefits of sexual activity that apply to adults, besides reproduction, apply to children.
>>17745700
And here we go, the argument from authority begins.
>>17745707
And the seething cope begins.
Just like in the other thread, he will deny that consensual adult-child sex exists, or if it does exist, it is too infrequent to matter. He spams irrelevant, poorly conducted studies with methodological flaws (they are all studies on self identified rape victims recruited from criminal/psychiatric samples) and refuses to admit that there are any issues with this approach:
>>17726366
He claims adult-child sex is inherently non-consensual, in spite of these anthropological examples where we can clearly read that these relationships are consensual, and that there is nothing inherent to adult-child sex which makes children indisposed to these relationships, unlike the victimologist feminist claim, and in spite of surveys in modern Western countries that show that the majority of adult-child sex is considered consensual by the child participant.
>>17745674
And just like in the other thread, you define your personal positions as axiomatic, not providing any argument to support them. You make an arbitrary distinction between the hedonic appreciation of sex and other human endeavours, without reason, and refuse to address any criticism of this position. You continue to argue a position which you know has been refuted, your claim is that it is not virtuous to engage in sexual activity for non-reproductive purposes, not that it is prudent to avoid sexual activity when there are better alternatives to bring about benefit.
When someone brings up a refutation of your point, you hand-wave it away by implying the matter of the refutation is too difficult to understand.
Give up. You can't even properly argue this strongly held position of yours.
>>17745687
All benefits of sexual activity that apply to adults, besides reproduction, apply to children.
>>17745700
And here we go, the argument from authority begins.
>>17745707
And the seething cope begins.
Page 1