>>101868719
Maybe? Some of us have definitely gotten a bit lazier since Illustrious came out.
But if the requests are things like "ex-holoEN1 with ex-holoEN2 holding hands" then you're using two different LoRAs that both are messing with your stylemix, and they're both trying to mutate the girls so they become chimeras of each other -type of situation.
>>101868846
I'm going to be a bit of a slow retard here, you don't have to bear with me.
>Adetailer is just inpainting, it's not really doing anything special other just auto masking the face
This part I understand in principle.
>there should be "inpainting" drop down, you can just copy the settings over to the inpaint tab and will work the exact same way.
There is an inpainting drop-down in the adetailer extension drop-down, yes.
The only things that are set there is the Inpainting mask blur, denoising strength, and "Inpaint only masked" is turned on with another value for Inpaint only masked padding, pixels.
So I take those setting, use them in the inpainting tab, and mask the faces myself?
Is it going to mess with the character's bangs, hair etc if I don't mask pixel perfect? Adetailer frequently improves their bangs etc, even though I don't prompt for it.
In my previous attempts to do things like this I've gotten camera facing faces on character's who have turned their heads sideways, etc.