Search Results
6/15/2025, 10:30:19 PM
>>211774860
>Claiming that those who discriminate against homosexuals are like the people who discriminate against women is 1. cheap propaganda (using the same logic, right-wing Republicans used to call traitors all those who opposed the war in Iraq) 2. an insult to women (that suffer from discrimination purely based on prejudice).
>What is missing on this issue is an honest debate because homosexuals have been able to create a terror campaign in "liberal" states like California, and their opponents have been able to create a terror campaign in "conservative" states. Living in California, sometimes i feel oppressed by homosexuals: the moment you speak up against gay marriage in California, you are treated like suspected communists were treated during the witch hunt of the 1950s. It's like criticizing Islam in Saudi Arabia. Some gay-rights advocates are proving to be children of the George W Bush era by using the same methods of psychological coercion that he used to go to war against Iraq and pass many dubious laws. When they call "prejudice" the opinion of others, they echo all the great dictators of the past. People who dare oppose gay marriage are branded as fanatics, but sometimes it's gay marriage advocates who are behaving like fundamentalists: they are creating a dogmatic religion in favor of gay marriage.
>Another non-trivial element in making me vote against homosexual marriage is that the world is falling apart and we waste energy and time discussing if homosexuals should or should not have the right to get married? It seems like we are tweaking the seats of the Titanic while it is sinking (which could be one of the reasons why it is sinking: we spent too much time around issues that were irrelevant while there was a much bigger problem that nobody really paid attention to).
>Claiming that those who discriminate against homosexuals are like the people who discriminate against women is 1. cheap propaganda (using the same logic, right-wing Republicans used to call traitors all those who opposed the war in Iraq) 2. an insult to women (that suffer from discrimination purely based on prejudice).
>What is missing on this issue is an honest debate because homosexuals have been able to create a terror campaign in "liberal" states like California, and their opponents have been able to create a terror campaign in "conservative" states. Living in California, sometimes i feel oppressed by homosexuals: the moment you speak up against gay marriage in California, you are treated like suspected communists were treated during the witch hunt of the 1950s. It's like criticizing Islam in Saudi Arabia. Some gay-rights advocates are proving to be children of the George W Bush era by using the same methods of psychological coercion that he used to go to war against Iraq and pass many dubious laws. When they call "prejudice" the opinion of others, they echo all the great dictators of the past. People who dare oppose gay marriage are branded as fanatics, but sometimes it's gay marriage advocates who are behaving like fundamentalists: they are creating a dogmatic religion in favor of gay marriage.
>Another non-trivial element in making me vote against homosexual marriage is that the world is falling apart and we waste energy and time discussing if homosexuals should or should not have the right to get married? It seems like we are tweaking the seats of the Titanic while it is sinking (which could be one of the reasons why it is sinking: we spent too much time around issues that were irrelevant while there was a much bigger problem that nobody really paid attention to).
Page 1