Search Results
7/12/2025, 7:00:56 AM
>>63968692
>>63968692
>Of any class?
>At any time?
Beside the point. Sino-Soviet (and their continuation states) doctrine define Nukes (and other WMDs) as The decisive instrument of warfare. Conventional forces are only there to exploit such openings. Current day Russian armed forces were tolerated to degrade by graft and negligence because they could be afforded to (unlike the nukes); this is underscored by deliberate targeting of civilians, rape and torture, as well as tolerance of stupidly high casualties as displays of Will which Western European pinko ruling castes couldn't ever tolerate without inducing civil unrest. Read picrel.
>short answer
Spycraft, active measures, strategic deception ("false liberalization" described by Golitsyn, Sejna, Bukovsky ...) some competitive jets at times, decent large payload SSBNs (which tended to get 'loud' after a year or two notwithstanding)-- and nukes, lots of them and always cheating arms control treaties.
>>63968692
>Of any class?
>At any time?
Beside the point. Sino-Soviet (and their continuation states) doctrine define Nukes (and other WMDs) as The decisive instrument of warfare. Conventional forces are only there to exploit such openings. Current day Russian armed forces were tolerated to degrade by graft and negligence because they could be afforded to (unlike the nukes); this is underscored by deliberate targeting of civilians, rape and torture, as well as tolerance of stupidly high casualties as displays of Will which Western European pinko ruling castes couldn't ever tolerate without inducing civil unrest. Read picrel.
>short answer
Spycraft, active measures, strategic deception ("false liberalization" described by Golitsyn, Sejna, Bukovsky ...) some competitive jets at times, decent large payload SSBNs (which tended to get 'loud' after a year or two notwithstanding)-- and nukes, lots of them and always cheating arms control treaties.
Page 1