Search Results
6/24/2025, 1:36:49 AM
>>17785191
Modern Rabbinic/Talmudic Judaism was more influenced by the Zoastrianism of the Sassanid Empire, where the Gathas and other Avestanic and Middle Persian books were written, than the Zoroastrianism of the Achaemenid Empire, which was closer to the Ancient Indo-Iranian Religion/Mazdaism, Vedism and influenced the Judean Religion of the Second Temple.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Iraq#Sasanian_period
https://zoroastrians.net/2013/07/25/cyrus-the-great-was-no-zoroastrian/
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=studiaantiqua
Buddhism arose from the Non-Brahmaniac Sramana, which was more influenced by the Upanishads than the Vedas, and the major Buddha of Mahayana and Vajrayana comes from Asura.
https://dijehtranslations.wordpress.com/2016/08/08/579/
https://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/en/search/search_detail.jsp?seq=325440
>Also what Persian ruler was the first to become Zoroastrian?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishtaspa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_the_Great
>>17785027
I said ITT that the biggest problem with the RigVeda is the disputes/suppressions of the Vedic and Proto-Zoroastrian Schools during the Oral and Written Period. But yes, Vedism is the closest we have to the PIE because the Andronovo had a lot of Steppe, even though they were R1a, and the Yamnaya/PIE lived between 3300–2500 BC, and the Rig-Veda was probably written between 600 BC–300 AD, being organized in the Gupta Period, 1900 years after the PIE, while the Celtic Lebor Gabála Érenn and Nordic Eddas were written 3300 years later, being that they are not even original records, but rather late compilations of heavily syncretized and Christianized oral traditions. Furthermore, these texts do not present rituals; they are essentially mythological narratives, which characterizes a paganism devoid of the organized ritualistic and liturgical structure present in the Rigveda.
Modern Rabbinic/Talmudic Judaism was more influenced by the Zoastrianism of the Sassanid Empire, where the Gathas and other Avestanic and Middle Persian books were written, than the Zoroastrianism of the Achaemenid Empire, which was closer to the Ancient Indo-Iranian Religion/Mazdaism, Vedism and influenced the Judean Religion of the Second Temple.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Iraq#Sasanian_period
https://zoroastrians.net/2013/07/25/cyrus-the-great-was-no-zoroastrian/
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=studiaantiqua
Buddhism arose from the Non-Brahmaniac Sramana, which was more influenced by the Upanishads than the Vedas, and the major Buddha of Mahayana and Vajrayana comes from Asura.
https://dijehtranslations.wordpress.com/2016/08/08/579/
https://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/en/search/search_detail.jsp?seq=325440
>Also what Persian ruler was the first to become Zoroastrian?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishtaspa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darius_the_Great
>>17785027
I said ITT that the biggest problem with the RigVeda is the disputes/suppressions of the Vedic and Proto-Zoroastrian Schools during the Oral and Written Period. But yes, Vedism is the closest we have to the PIE because the Andronovo had a lot of Steppe, even though they were R1a, and the Yamnaya/PIE lived between 3300–2500 BC, and the Rig-Veda was probably written between 600 BC–300 AD, being organized in the Gupta Period, 1900 years after the PIE, while the Celtic Lebor Gabála Érenn and Nordic Eddas were written 3300 years later, being that they are not even original records, but rather late compilations of heavily syncretized and Christianized oral traditions. Furthermore, these texts do not present rituals; they are essentially mythological narratives, which characterizes a paganism devoid of the organized ritualistic and liturgical structure present in the Rigveda.
Page 1