>>531575557
>I explained why they were bad
Your "explanation" is that you have an autistic fixation on authentic fencer movements because it's your fetish or some similarly retarded shit.
>you are unable to explain why they are good
Except I explained in my first post that they are well animated, fitting for her feminine form and not as visually busy as some later attackers' VFX design. You are free to disagree but don't pester me with your philistine opinions.
The belt doesn't change expression in combat because the user's expression didn't change.