>>28492258


Feel free to use any words you like dude and I'll tell you what I think they mean and you'll tell me what you think they mean in response and we have a conversation about it. Which I've already been doing but you clearly can't return the favor so I'll be the bigger man and come down to your level. Since you know I'll note you still have yet to set even a single foot out on a branch to stake out a positive position on anything. I'll also note that for all your obsession with tribal affiliations you have curiously neglected to mention what tribe you affiliate yourself with at any point in the proceedings. I'll also note that your parochial presumptions of a narrow set of post-enlightenment ideologies as representative of the whole world of possible thought is Pure Ideology and also entirely expectable from a parrot like yourself.
Honestly thought not only do you not understand other people's words you don't even understand your own words; you just mash sounds together in patterns you notice get results you want without any deeper thought or insight into the process.