>>63998066
>Are you having a stroke? It appears you've lost command of the language.
You definitely had a stroke since you can't recognize your own point. Expert shooters didn't do better than retarded conscripted at shooting. So the individual shooter made no difference.

>With ironsights and conscripts who only had 40% accuracy against a man sized-target on a flat range at 100 yards? Fill in the blanks for me.
Here's the answer: <300 yards. A range where assault rifles excel at and where battle rifles flounder. Now shut the fuck up.

>Which is a lie.
Only when it's inconvenient for you. You're so keen on cherrypicking the parts that you do agree on yet handwave everything else you hate as a "lie", while accusing the army for handwaving battle rifles over m16s.

>they knew full well that SCHV bullets were not as lethal as full caliber rifle bullets at practicable engagement speeds
Says who? You Big Retard

>and that's the reason why they were shilling nerve toxin bullets fired 5 per cartridge.
No, because the first sentence of that image you provided says that increasing "hitting power" doesn't improve lethality. And thats why shit smeared bullets will hurt the whole body through infection from just a scratch. Or maybe shooting the enemy in the guts more with bullet hoses. Read your own fucking source and weep.

>You're advocating for SALVO now? Let's fucking ggooooooo. How did that project turn out for you?
Pretty good I'll say, especially when they dabbed on your shit takes too before your mother shat you out. Your next words are "that's a lie".