>>512453899
>not to justify exclusion based on race or bloodlines
You ALREADY conceded that it's NOT intrinsically wrong for an indigenous people to desire to remain majority within their ancestral homeland here >>512450853 and furthermore WHO ARE YOU to make that determination? By whose or what authority? It's for the indigenous people themselves to decide, not you.
>Indigenous rights exist to protect marginalized cultures from being erased,
picrel, literally a fraction of the world population. Not even ONE percent of the world population.
>You keep trying to twist "indigenous" into a free pass for racial dominance
And who are the Irish trying to dominate? We're only asserting our indigenous rights over our ancestral homeland.
>And the"I don't consent to definitions I don't like" shtick. Absolute kindergarten logic. The rest of us live in a world where words actually mean things, even when you don’t get to define them.
And that's why you yourself have to redefine terms in private societies? Tell you what, we're starting a right wing historical society and we use English dictionary definitions. Now what do you do? By what authority do you compel me to conform to your redefined terms?
> academia
Which academia? Chines academia? Russian academia? Because you realize they have their own definitions? I reject your academia. How do you compel me to conform to it?
>and international policy.
Buddy, in case you haven't noticed that's moving further and further right.
https://www.politico.eu/article/german-government-extend-border-checks-alexander-dobrindt-migration/
>You tried to strip it down to “born there
No I didn't, even non Irish born here have to leave, it's indigenous land belonging to indigenous people.