Search Results
7/23/2025, 8:11:06 PM
>>17866298
That kind of language has been abrogated due to idolatrous association, see for example this verse where the same thing happened with the actual God. However if you say you will take it as proof then I will say that Jesus is god in the biblical sense and not the modern day English term you're equivocating with it. You have to read your theology from the text and not into it. Go ask any Rabbi if they believe these humans being called as such are literally God himself. Of course not, and that's because they know the language and how it works. Now as for
That kind of language has been abrogated due to idolatrous association, see for example this verse where the same thing happened with the actual God. However if you say you will take it as proof then I will say that Jesus is god in the biblical sense and not the modern day English term you're equivocating with it. You have to read your theology from the text and not into it. Go ask any Rabbi if they believe these humans being called as such are literally God himself. Of course not, and that's because they know the language and how it works. Now as for
7/16/2025, 10:52:22 AM
>>17846243
We don't reject it in the sense Jesus could have used it, it's simply obsolete terminology that has been abrogated. This shouldn't be unfamiliar to you since the same happened in the bible.
We don't reject it in the sense Jesus could have used it, it's simply obsolete terminology that has been abrogated. This shouldn't be unfamiliar to you since the same happened in the bible.
Page 1