Search Results
7/16/2025, 6:50:35 AM
>>17845820
>Everybody but myself Bruce Rind and the editors of the newgon wiki are all statistical amateurs and make simple mistakes like confusing confounding and skew ... oh wait
The study is highly regarded and is still cited to this day, you can stop pretending that the study was rejected: >>17845456
>unequivocally demonstrating that they have in fact accounted for the "confounding" this anon believes he has discovered among other statistical issues, yet when the truth is laid out in front of him, he will still deny it.
You haven't posted a shred of evidence to support this claim. You have posted irrelevant studies which do not support this claim, and have refused to accept this when I have pointed this out.
>>17845824
There are many other studies by different authors in those reviews posted. You would know if you actually bothered to read them, but you didn't, as you lack intellectual honesty. And the Rind study is still highly regarded and relevant and is cited to this very day.
I always find it intriguing how obstinate antis are in defending a position for which they have absolutely no evidence in favour of, yet they'll accuse you of what they are themselves guilty of. Really goes to show how few people are capable of maintaining intellectual positions which are contrary to widely held belief. Most antis would just as easily be arguing that masturbation causes insanity, that having sex with virgins cures diseases, or that sex causes puberty, had they been born in an earlier time period or culture.
>Everybody but myself Bruce Rind and the editors of the newgon wiki are all statistical amateurs and make simple mistakes like confusing confounding and skew ... oh wait
The study is highly regarded and is still cited to this day, you can stop pretending that the study was rejected: >>17845456
>unequivocally demonstrating that they have in fact accounted for the "confounding" this anon believes he has discovered among other statistical issues, yet when the truth is laid out in front of him, he will still deny it.
You haven't posted a shred of evidence to support this claim. You have posted irrelevant studies which do not support this claim, and have refused to accept this when I have pointed this out.
>>17845824
There are many other studies by different authors in those reviews posted. You would know if you actually bothered to read them, but you didn't, as you lack intellectual honesty. And the Rind study is still highly regarded and relevant and is cited to this very day.
I always find it intriguing how obstinate antis are in defending a position for which they have absolutely no evidence in favour of, yet they'll accuse you of what they are themselves guilty of. Really goes to show how few people are capable of maintaining intellectual positions which are contrary to widely held belief. Most antis would just as easily be arguing that masturbation causes insanity, that having sex with virgins cures diseases, or that sex causes puberty, had they been born in an earlier time period or culture.
Page 1