Search Results
7/13/2025, 1:56:59 PM
>>937036891
That's not strictly an answer. We can see that the foot has human skin, human flesh, human blood, human bone. We can test its DNA and confirm that the results show 'human'. This would all seem to make it far more obviously human than picrel, yet you haver. You won't say that it is and won't strictly say that it isn't, you just retreat to personal incredulity and insult.
That's not strictly an answer. We can see that the foot has human skin, human flesh, human blood, human bone. We can test its DNA and confirm that the results show 'human'. This would all seem to make it far more obviously human than picrel, yet you haver. You won't say that it is and won't strictly say that it isn't, you just retreat to personal incredulity and insult.
Page 1