>>510167814
>That's your opinion.
And it's correct.
>With the profits they make off the
Financial profits are impossible without perpetual geometric growth of the supply of legal tender.
>rented land they save up enough to buy their own land
Building up wealth from parasitism is only possible inside of capitalism and requires perpetual geometric growth of the supply of legal tender.
>The landowner earned their money in another industry
Hilariously wrong. He borrowed from a bank which created fictional yet spendable amounts of new, not previously existing, legal tender for him on the spot. Which he used to buy things in the real world. This is how 99.99% of real estate acquisitions occur. Hardly anyone can afford or even wants to self fund real estate acquisitions from savings accrued against galloping inflation, lmfao.
>The farmer who paid to rent the land did so voluntarily. The landowner who rented the land agreed to allow its use for a fixed rate and both parties benefited. No government needed to be involved.
I never volunteered
>Taxes are anti-civilization.
Ok. Capitalism has:
1. Property tax, which is theft.
2. Loads of taxes after income tax, even though all taxes are paid from past and present income so any tax after income tax is double taxation.
3. Corporate personhood, which is unequal treatment under the law.
4. Banking, which is legalised fraud. And no, not JUST central banking is legalised fraud.
>Deficit spending are anti-civilization.
You expected me to defend deficit spending? Money is anti-civilisation.
Also, why is public deficit spending bad but private sector ballooning debt, which only gets rolled over, good?
>This is my opinion, the opposite of yours.
My opinions are correct, however.