Search Results
7/16/2025, 2:25:48 PM
>>40735740
>anyone could, in fact, look at a circle and truthfully say it’s a square, given a hypothetical scenario in which they were told a circle was a square from childhood.
Thios is the pristine example of a semantic argument, where you have changed the argument ffrom the topic at hand to "what if they just called circles squares, then they would say square!"
>people are fundamentally different
but again - you can have the EXACT SAME PERSON with the EXACT SAME INFO and come to completely opposite conclusions, and both conclusions can be true.
Like gif related.
You can stare at this, not moving, not blinking, not changing anything at all about the info or the person receiving it.
And simply by DECIDING that you see the image spinning left or spinning right, that becomes the truth.
>anyone could, in fact, look at a circle and truthfully say it’s a square, given a hypothetical scenario in which they were told a circle was a square from childhood.
Thios is the pristine example of a semantic argument, where you have changed the argument ffrom the topic at hand to "what if they just called circles squares, then they would say square!"
>people are fundamentally different
but again - you can have the EXACT SAME PERSON with the EXACT SAME INFO and come to completely opposite conclusions, and both conclusions can be true.
Like gif related.
You can stare at this, not moving, not blinking, not changing anything at all about the info or the person receiving it.
And simply by DECIDING that you see the image spinning left or spinning right, that becomes the truth.
Page 1