Search Results
7/4/2025, 10:51:29 PM
>>509520356
well yes, it is mugal art, and it is related to my expose on gay muslim history I didnt even deny. I said Mugal, you didnt even know straight away mugals are from india and you had to reverse image search to somehow get me, but you ended up looking like a moron who doesnt know who mugals even were...Im from Croatia bro, chill, here, have some turkish art
>Bartolomej Dordevic (1510-1566) wrote two documents about his experience in Turkish hands. Thirteen times a slave, he was seven times sold. He gives an eloquent description of the march of child slaves from European battlefields to Turkey. Slave buyers followed Turkish armies, each dealer marching 50 to 60 children on foot back to Turkey, manacled hand and foot. At night, he writes, one suffered at hearing the moans and tears of the boy chosen for the night to endure the slave-merchant's lust. Even those as young as seven could not protect themselves from violation, save for the most beautiful 10% who were reserved as gifts for the Sultan. Of these, the ruler took his pick for his own "pleasures against nature"; the rest were presented to friends, put into houses of male prostitution, or sold in the marketplaces. Some historians suggest that Bayezid 1 (1360-1403) discovered the delights of boys, and sent his soldiers all over the areas of conquest to find the most charming youngsters for his harem. From his example, the practice of taking boys sexually spread in the army, among government officials, and through the nobility. One reason why the Turks continued and expanded their wars of conquest was reputedly to keep up the supply of young boys -- especially the beautiful, highly desired European children. This, as much as anything else, contributed to European hatred of Turks.
well yes, it is mugal art, and it is related to my expose on gay muslim history I didnt even deny. I said Mugal, you didnt even know straight away mugals are from india and you had to reverse image search to somehow get me, but you ended up looking like a moron who doesnt know who mugals even were...Im from Croatia bro, chill, here, have some turkish art
>Bartolomej Dordevic (1510-1566) wrote two documents about his experience in Turkish hands. Thirteen times a slave, he was seven times sold. He gives an eloquent description of the march of child slaves from European battlefields to Turkey. Slave buyers followed Turkish armies, each dealer marching 50 to 60 children on foot back to Turkey, manacled hand and foot. At night, he writes, one suffered at hearing the moans and tears of the boy chosen for the night to endure the slave-merchant's lust. Even those as young as seven could not protect themselves from violation, save for the most beautiful 10% who were reserved as gifts for the Sultan. Of these, the ruler took his pick for his own "pleasures against nature"; the rest were presented to friends, put into houses of male prostitution, or sold in the marketplaces. Some historians suggest that Bayezid 1 (1360-1403) discovered the delights of boys, and sent his soldiers all over the areas of conquest to find the most charming youngsters for his harem. From his example, the practice of taking boys sexually spread in the army, among government officials, and through the nobility. One reason why the Turks continued and expanded their wars of conquest was reputedly to keep up the supply of young boys -- especially the beautiful, highly desired European children. This, as much as anything else, contributed to European hatred of Turks.
Page 1