Search Results
7/14/2025, 12:23:35 PM
>>22235250
Pretty rich coming from someone who's so desperate to be right that you're unironically trying to define your preference as the objectively best one, so that you can't be wrong about the kind of woman you find attractive.
You want to call others losers who are forced to abandon standards and convince themselves that they just like something different, while being so insecure yourself that you have to define specific characteristics as the official ideal, just so that you wouldn't be slave to a personal preference, but instead could align what you like with what's objectively correct to like.
How ever pathetic someone might have to be to fuck anything in the absence of personal desirability, they can't be as pathetic as someone who has to insist on only liking the literally best things in order to have "objectively good taste."
TL;DR: Go back in your corner and back to telling yourself that Citizen Kane is your favorite film.
Pretty rich coming from someone who's so desperate to be right that you're unironically trying to define your preference as the objectively best one, so that you can't be wrong about the kind of woman you find attractive.
You want to call others losers who are forced to abandon standards and convince themselves that they just like something different, while being so insecure yourself that you have to define specific characteristics as the official ideal, just so that you wouldn't be slave to a personal preference, but instead could align what you like with what's objectively correct to like.
How ever pathetic someone might have to be to fuck anything in the absence of personal desirability, they can't be as pathetic as someone who has to insist on only liking the literally best things in order to have "objectively good taste."
TL;DR: Go back in your corner and back to telling yourself that Citizen Kane is your favorite film.
Page 1