>>149311926
>Olympics broadcasting chief btw
Don't be fucking stupid, I'm not """labeling""" anything, I'm using the words and terminology that is commonly used, there aren't very many other ways to describe it, "preventing objectivism" "male gaze" "sexism"
I'm providing commentary on the realities of why the angles have changed for the WORSE, they're putting out a worse product in the pursuit of "feminism" and "progressivism", they want to shoot men and women in the same way when the body mechanics aren't the same, what people want to see isn't the same.
I first remember them talking about this during the Rio games, I don't want retarded athletes or jumped up execs who spend all their time with SJWs changing the policy, speak to camerawo/men, directors, photographers, people who specialise in this stuff to make the best product. I have no problem with progressivism, I just don't like the point they're thinking about this from, it's nothing to do with the labeling, it's the substance.
I wanna see big bootys obviously, if they take it away at least make the product better and have a justifiable reason.