>>280731776
> He's not into loli
You mean the character?
Who cares. Just look at him: >>280728957
He's even worse than most explicit "loli" characters. Say what you will about the girls from Montigari, at least they look like they'll turn eventually into women. This guy seems very intentionally designed to look how children do before they develop secondary sexual characteristics. Which I imagine was the point; as some kind of thesis about "gender being fluid" or whatever.