>>510582697
>do a gentlemen's agreement not to use nukes on each other even in case of hot war?
Well they can allowed it. Unlike us they have enough economic force to bend someones knee without direct military response. We doesn't have that ability so that's one of the reasons SMO even started
>Do you see Russia sticking to it's nukes even at risk of isolation
If things would be smelled as something burned we used them with 1488% rate
>would it adapt to a drone-oriented MIC?
It's kinda happend. Now most MIC facilities now stamps drones even with higher quantities that even small arms BUT(T) no one drone can dismantle some Rammstein airbaise with one shot and make place unusable for a couple of weeks. WMD can do that shit